Does anyone get this burning feeling that we've got it all wrong with this smoking ban business? Everyone, bar some serious smokers and clubbers who'd smelt Irish and Scottish sweaty dens, were celebrating the coming of 1 July 2007. Weary smokers were looking for another excuse to quit; non-smokers were waiting for the fresher air. I was certain that this was a triumphant, brave decision by our in-touch politicians to bring
But I'm now getting the niggling feeling that we've got it all wrong. Don't get me wrong, I'm not thinking about this from a petty personal point of view - I like the clear air that doesn't make my eyes water. Also, I'm not a member of the "second hand smoke is not harmful" nuts that still exist out there. No. I'm not writing this for my self-interest. I’m thinking that we’ve got it wrong, because we’ve let the government legislate on a trendy hate.
I think we've let ourselves, fellow Englanders, down. We have let science, fashionable hates and popular moralising merge in such an insipid way that we forgot to think about our liberal principles, the limited role of the state and our choices as free individuals.
The legislation that led to the day of the ban is, granted, informed on science and history that weighs a heavy burden on the brutal tactics of big fag companies. But, if you’ve got a problem with the world smoking too much, I think you better ask questions of the corporate and political elite that has backed the big tobacco companies. (Particularly as these companies continue to use the same hard sell techniques – smoke and you’ll look better, feel better and have more sex – in the third world that we got rid of ages ago.) But, don’t support this fashionable legislating at its very worst.
Forever a decade behind the
***
Let’s make a new rule: never again shall we use the blunt instrument of legislation to randomly manage risks that involve our choices.
Smoking is a risk, but a risk that it is free for people to take. Passive smoking is a risk, but one that can be significantly limited through public pressure by creating smoking only zones and well circulated environments, which was being achieved in recent years.
Driving is a risk, but a risk that is free for people to take. Passive driving (walking, cycling, running) is a risk, but one that can be through pressure be severely limited by creating speed limits etc.
Banning smoking in pubs is like banning driving on country roads.
The analogy may not be water-tight, but the logic is plain to see. (Simon Jenkins' analogy with cats and dogs is better.) If you want legislation to manage risk that involve our choices, let’s do it properly, let’s go the whole hog and ban everything. Let’s ban driving on country roads and cats and dogs anywhere…
But that's where I wake up and realise that we are already there. Selling arms everywhere whilst upgrading cannabis to grade B. Banning smoking indoors over here whilst selling ciggies the good old fashioned way over there.
Fuck it, on that note I'm starting smoking. Won’t you join me outside?